Amongst league and union personnel alike, it has actually become accepted that, if the NFL plays just one week of video games, the players end up being instantly entitled to 100 percent of their pay. The only argument that would support not paying players their base incomes comes from the Standard Player Contract, which can be interpreted to mean that no obligation to pay salary emerges up until at least one video game is played. Simply put, if the whole season is ditched, the obligation to pay salary to players becomes ditched, too.
The ongoing negotiations in between the NFL and NFL Players Association relating to pandemic procedures could result in a deadlock, with the league implementing its favored guidelines and the union challenging the guidelines by means of an accelerated complaint. Or the talks might result in a compromise.
Its a topic weve mentioned numerous times. The Collective Bargaining Agreement, ratified by the union after the pandemic began, contains no force majeuere provision. More particularly, it has no arrangement that allows the NFL to reduce 2020 gamer pay in case of canceled video games or a considerable profits drop occurring from, for instance, a pandemic.
All of this indicates is that, regarding the financial side of the present discussion, the gamers have the power to cross their arms and state, “We have a deal in place that applies to this circumstance.” The present deal implies that, unless theres no season, the players get full pay and, come 2021, the two sides will determine what the cap will be.
More specifically, it has no provision that permits the NFL to decrease 2020 player pay in the event of canceled games or a significant profits drop emerging from, for example, a pandemic.
Getty Images
The NFLPAs utilize in these discussions comes from the monetary side of the equation. Its the league, not the NFLPA, that presently is trying to find a modification to the status quo, because the status quo significantly prefers the gamers.
And heres the secret: The unions desire to do anything other than what the existing CBA calls for offers the union leverage to get what it desires when it concerns the security treatments for professional football in a pandemic. Heres hoping that the interplay in between the safety side of the talks and the monetary side will allow all concerns to get dealt with as quickly as possible, so that management and labor can pivot arm in arm towards the far greater obstacle, offered the present state of the outbreak, to make the 2020 season work.
The basic response is that the cap will drop considerably based on the cash lost this year. Does anyone really believe groups want that to occur? They require to field competitive teams, and they will not wish to shed crucial players. The NFLPA has proposed smoothing the losses over the next nine years; thats what the NFL needs to desire, too.
This arrangement means that the cancellation of games or a considerable profits drop due to the pandemic requires the league and the union to participate in “excellent faith negotiations” concerning the effect of the lost income on the 2021 cap. Naturally, they do that anyhow; every year, the cap is the product of NFL and NFLPA conversations on what it should be.
They need to field competitive teams, and they wont desire to shed key players.
Among league and union personnel alike, it has actually become accepted that, if the NFL plays just one week of games, the players end up being instantly entitled to 100 percent of their pay. The only argument that would support not paying gamers their base wages comes from the Standard Player Contract, which can be analyzed to indicate that no responsibility to pay income emerges till at least one video game is played. In other words, if the whole season is scrapped, the commitment to pay income to players ends up being scrapped, too.
