The author measure an 85-inch TV.
Sarah Tew/CNET
This story is part of CNET at 25, commemorating a quarter century of market tech and our function in telling you its story.
Watch me establish a TV evaluation lab in my basement.
If you could point to one tech trend over the last 25 years, its that gadgets are getting smaller. A watch was pretty much the exact same size however simply informed time: It could not begin to think of all the functions we see in todays smartwatches.
TVs took a various path. They got smarter too, but with the advent of flat-panel LCD, plasma and OLED technology theyve also grown. A lot. 2 years ago a 32-inch television was ridiculously heavy and massive– usually more than 100 pounds and bulky sufficient to require its own piece of furniture. Today that exact same screen size is considered too small for many bed rooms and you can get an inconceivably gigantic 75-inch screen for less than $1,000..
” Screen sizes keep getting bigger and that has shown to drive interest and demand,” stated Steven Baker, VP of industry analysis at NPD group. “The No. 1 reason individuals purchase a brand-new TV is for the screen size and I do not anticipate that to alter.”.
Now playing:.
Watch this:.
6:17.
Absolutely tubeless today.
Sonys 34-inch tube television was a 200-pound beast.
Crutchfield.
Ive been CNETs TV reviewer since 2002, and spent years examining TVs for other publications before that, so Ive seen a great deal of that change personally. I remember getting in a 34-inch widescreen Sony cathode ray tube TV for review (one of the last of its kind and a superb entertainer) and dealing with a coworker to lift it onto a mean examination. The thing weighed almost 200 pounds. Today I consistently raise 65-inch LCD and OLED models out of their boxes and onto stands by myself– particularly now that Im working from home due to the coronavirus pandemic and my colleagues arent around to assist.
Thats 2 years after I began at CNET and a time when most TVs were still CRTs and rear-projection models– just 7% of TVs sold that year were flat-panel. Today every Television offered is a flat-panel TV.
TV size and cost averages over 15 years.
Screen size.
Selling cost.
$/ sq. inch.
2004.
25.4.
$ 2.15.
$ 552.
2019.
47.
Innovation.
Model.
Year.
Screen size.
Brett Pearce/CNET.
Prior to flat TVs came along, the most important element restricting the mass adoption of cinemas wasnt desire– weve constantly wished for a huge, immersive, theatrical photo in our living-room. It was technology. CRT-based TVs maxed out at 40 inches so if you desired a larger screen your only choice was a technology that passed away eight years ago: rear-projection..
In the past you might purchase a rear-projection TV that was 65 inches and even bigger, but it took up a big portion of space and cost a relative fortune. A fine example was the Samsung HL-S5687 I reviewed for CNET in 2006. This 56-inch television cost $2,700 at the time and I called it “a top option for individuals who want a 1080p cinema but do not want to break the bank.” Yep, almost 3 grand for a 56-inch television was a good worth 15 years back. I told my future father-in-law to buy that very same Television and he utilized it for 12 years before upgrading to an LG OLED.
In succeeding years flat-panel TVs ended up being more affordable to produce and prices quickly fell, helped by models such as the Vizio P50HD, a 50-inch plasma Television that cost “just” $2,000– an incredible deal in 2006. It took another couple of years for larger flat-panel TVs to get affordable.
Select TVs throughout the fat-to-flat transition.
$ 0.39.
$ 336.
Price.
Although Ive been evaluating TVs for that whole 15-year stretch, its still fantastic to me how stark those numbers are. The most outstanding is the last one: Calculating from that average size and cost, a square inch of screen in 2004 expense more than 5 times as much (!) If you element in inflation, as it does today– more than seven times as much. Baker states the typical cost of TVs peaked in 2007 between $900 and $1,000.
People have actually also changed their TV-buying routines in the last 25 years. Baker points out three major patterns: The emergence of online retailers such as Amazon; the fact that big-box merchants including Walmart, Target and Costco are offering more TVs both online and in stores; and the desire of people to purchase a brand-new TV without it being a long, dragged out procedure. “Price points for high quality, big screen TVs have fallen so much that a broader swath of customers can easily manage to buy one,” he said. In other words, its now a lot simpler, and less expensive, to buy a TV.
CNETs Scott Stein in front of a 92-inch Mitsubishi 840 series rear-projection television, one of the last of its kind.
Sarah Tew/CNET.
Buh-bye big black boxes.
2004.
Sony KD-34XBR960.
34-inch.
$ 2,200.
CRT.
2005.
Sony KDL-VXBR1.
40-inch.
$ 4,000.
LCD.
2006.
Vizio P50HD.
50-inch.
$ 2,000.
Plasma.
2006.
Samsung HL-S5687.
56-inch.
$ 2,700.
Rear-projection DLP.
2007.
Panasonic TH-58PX600U.
58-inch.
Plasma.
$ 5,800.
2009.
Panasonic TC-P54G10.
54-inch.
$ 1,600.
Plasma.
2009.
Mitsubishi WD-65737.
65-inch.
Rear-projection DLP.
$ 1,600.
2013.
Panasonic TC-P65ST60.
65-inch.
Samsung.
$ 2,000.
Plasma.
The transition from rear-projection to flat-panel was essentially complete simply three years later on with CNETs last RPTV review, the 65-inch Mitsubishi WD-65737. In 2009 it cost $1,600 and although it had an “exceptional screen-size-to-price ratio” in my evaluation, the writing was on the wall for these big, awful black boxes. Mitsubishi was the last business to make a RPTV and it offered its last one in 2012.
Get CNETs extensive protection of house entertainment tech provided to your inbox.
CNET TVs, Streaming and Audio.
Pour one out for plasma.
Rear-projection was replaced by plasma among big-screen hunters. For several years as a reviewer I steered readers not towards LCD-based flat-panel TVs but toward plasma, another flat-panel television innovation that, in my tests, produced a better picture for less money than LCD. Panasonic blazed a trail with many outstanding designs and Samsung likewise had some superb examples, with each business making every effort to surpass the other in image quality with each succeeding year. Ultimately the requirement for greater resolution– specifically 4K, which plasma couldnt easily attain– and the falling costs of LCD pressed plasma out of the market..
The ZT60 was the supreme Panasonic plasma TV in more methods than one.
Sarah Tew/CNET.
Panasonic made its last customer plasma TV for the United States in 2013, the outstanding ZT60, a set I hailed as being “closer than ever to best photo quality.” Samsung stopped making new plasmas in the same year although its flagship model, the also excellent F8500, remained on sale through the list below year. It was truly the last excellent plasma TV.
Those two brand names exemplify how wagering on the incorrect TV technology horse can go awry. Panasonic invested heavily in plasma however after that innovation failed it ended up leaving the United States totally in 2016– and hasnt sold a new TV here considering that. Samsung invested mostly in LCD and, more just recently, in its SUHD and QLED-branded LCD versions, and has actually enjoyed the No. 1 around the world market share in TVs for more than a decade.
2019 top 5 market share (units offered).
21%.
TCL.
15%.
Vizio.
14%.
LG.
10%.
Hisense.
5%.
Now playing:.
Watch this:.
” The shift in the last 15 years is plainly the brand name change far from the Japanese brands, who were ascendant at that time and the rise of the Korean brand names and then more just recently the Chinese brands,” said Baker. Japan-based makers Mitsubishi, Hitachi and Panasonic were all home television names in the last 15 years. All have given that bailed out of the market to make space for Korean and Chinese brand names like Samsung, LG and TCL..
Sony, a force over the last 25 years and the only major Japanese television maker remaining today, has actually seen its market share shrink progressively. Its not even in the Top 5 anymore.
Commemorating 25 years of CNET.
3:58.
Now playing:.
See this:.
Samsung The Wall 292-inch MicroLED TV: Huge.
To 85 inches (for $1,000) and beyond.
I concur with Baker: People will constantly desire bigger, more affordable TVs. The next frontier is almost incomprehensibly substantial– 85 inches– however today you can buy one for $1,900.
3:35.
Considering that I began other television patterns have taken hold too. Todays sets have scads of integrated streaming apps, Alexa and Google Assistant voice 8k, control and 4k resolution with high vibrant range and more. The most obvious change for me has always been that ballooning size, and as far as Im concerned its an excellent thing. When it concerns house entertainment, bigger really is much better.
Ive been CNETs TV reviewer considering that 2002, and invested years reviewing TVs for other publications prior to that, so Ive seen a lot of that change in person. Thats 2 years after I started at CNET and a time when most TVs were still CRTs and rear-projection designs– just 7% of TVs offered that year were flat-panel. Today every Television sold is a flat-panel TV.
In being successful years flat-panel TVs ended up being cheaper to produce and costs rapidly fell, assisted by models such as the Vizio P50HD, a 50-inch plasma Television that cost “simply” $2,000– a remarkable bargain in 2006. For years as a customer I guided readers not toward LCD-based flat-panel TVs however toward plasma, another flat-panel Television innovation that, in my tests, produced a much better photo for less money than LCD.
